The Skinny: Somebody here isn't doing it
Ladies and Gentlemen good day and welcome to “The Skinny”: My recycling blog dedicated to trimming down the waste we produce here on our merry olde New.England campus.
Now, before I get down and dirty on the details I want to make it clear that I am a stark raving environmentalist with little inclination towards reality. This is why I have agents in the field. They keep me grounded and allow to relate “what’s really going on out there” with some sort of objectivity before digressing into ideology.
But enough about me. At the beginning of the school year I had a conversation with one of my agents – let’s just call him Brother J - who is currently enrolled at Cornell University about his experiences with his new housemates. It went a lil’ bit like this:
Me: Hey Brother J. What the scoop down there at Cornell. How are “the kids these days”.
Brother J: It’s crazy man. My new roommates don’t even know what recycling is.
Me: What do you mean? You mean that they don’t do it, right?
Brother J: No. They don’t know what it is. Forget fancy stuff like plastics and computers. These people don’t know the basics. I tell them, “that paper there. It’s recyclable. And that soda can. You can put it in this bin. You shouldn’t put it in the trash.” And they all looked at me like “wha???”
Me: Like “wha???”
Brother J: Yeah. Like “wha???”
Me: “Wha???”
Brother J: Exactly.
See, this is the kind of quality “on the ground” research I was talking about earlier and goes to show the immense scale of operation “The Skinny”. GREAT work Brother J. And Brother J is but one of my agents out in the field working tirelessly to give myself and the good people of Tufts University “The Skinny” on “what’s really going on out there”.
Now before you go “Those silly Ivy Leaguers. What a bunch of tools. That would never happen here at Tufts” CHECK YOURSELF. The FACTS serve to prove otherwise! Trash sorts carried out by Tufts’ very own Tufts Recycles have shown that nearly 26% of all waste in our trash bins is composed of - you guessed it - paper, cans, and bottles. The basics of recycling. SOMEBODY HERE ISN’T DOING IT.
So maybe you know better and act on that guardian instinct. If you do: strong work soldier. We approve. If you don’t: Check out what the waste bins in your dorm say right on them and according put the appropriate items in those bins. You’ll pick it up quick. And if you know somebody that doesn’t: Be like Brother J and politely educate ‘em.
The more waste we can reduce, the fewer landfills we have to make. And the fewer landfills we have to make, the fewer “Not In My BackYard” campaigns we’ll have that are only trying to keep somebody else’s garbage out of their municipality but end up inadvertently destroying all federal protection provided to our nation’s isolated wetlands. Whew. But that’s a discussion for another time.
See you next time…
Posted by Dan at 1:36 PM
October 7, 2008GREENPEACE EXPOSES PRISTINE FOREST DESTINED FOR THE TRASH
Does this look like something you want to blow your nose with? 
Last month, Greenpeace released photos of a large stockpile of logs. It is an ugly picture, but hardly shocking for someone from Sweden, used to seeing logging trucks and trains whizz past. The logs’ origin and destiny is what makes the photos truly horrendous. Their origin is the Ogoki Forest, a region of the ancient Boreal Forest in Canada. Their destiny? The trash.
According to Greenpeace, the stockpiles of ancient trees will be turned into pulp, and then turned into the paper products sold by the Kimberly-Clark Corporation. Kimberly-Clark owns many of the world’s most popular brands of disposable paper products intended for personal use, including Kleenex and Scott’s.
In their July 2008 sustainability report, Kimberly-Clark claimed that most of their fiber comes from byproducts of the logging process, including chips and sawdust. These photos paint a different picture. Greenpeace gives further evidence of Kimberly-Clark’s forestry mismanagement with Canadian government data, which shows that Kimberly-Clark’s insatiable demand is causing logging to push even further into the virgin Ogoki region. This is especially devastating because the Forest is the delicate habitat of the endangered woodland caribou.
However, the worst part of the trees’ story is its tragically abrupt end. From their pulp, Kimberly-Clark will make some paper products that are used less than a minute, and rarely more than a couple of seconds. Their tissues and toilet paper are designed to be thrown away directly after use. That such old, exceptional trees should have to meet such an end is undignified.
The question now becomes, what can you do about it? First of all, if this tragic tale has made you upset; don’t reach for that tissue box! The fact that people are buying these tissues is the key to a much larger problem. Therefore, first ask yourself if you really need to use disposable paper products, or if you can easily substitute reusable ones, like cloth handkerchiefs. If you decide to continue- an understandable choice in the case of toilet paper - insist on using only products made with recycled content and sustainable wood, certified by the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC). You may chose to follow this simple advice on your own, or make your voice heard by supporting the campaign at http://www.kleercut.net/en/
This leads me to wonder… Does Tufts indirectly support Kimberly-Clark mismanagement by buying their products? What products do Tufts students really use? This deserves closer inspection…
To be continued…
Posted by amanda at 11:08 AM